Something like that. I always consider this world the be straight in that it deals with fixed outcomes instead of variables, only problem is that this world is unstable, and cannot determine an outcome. Of course this is where the circles come into play. They do not make outcomes, only paths. What I mean is that circles have no ends, and do not form them. As a result circles contradict squares, and will not abide by them. As a result people question my integrity online, but the fact is that I cannot conclude a circle even if I try, because circles are in determinate, and squares are determined. As a result I am contradicted at every intersection because I cannot gain perspective when it consists with my own, because I do not have a perspective. That would be a determining factor. This is my fatal weakness in that I cannot be determined, and this means that I am contradicted at every interval. Circles cannot make squares, and yes qube is better in this case, because we are talking about a former square. But this world would be a damaged one.