See this theory about “wanting things” is an ascetic ideal similar to many cult doctrines. The idea functions as a fiendish coping mechanism for a broken ego that seeks to justify theft. A lot of “con” jobs focus on exploiting “concurrency”.
This reminds me of a forum post I once read by an INTJ. It was the usual backwards ass social warrior type shtick that transpires after an Ni type gets stuck in the bargaining stages of grief. The thread was titled “Is it rape?”. The example I posted was that if one attempts to murder and the victim dies days later as a result then it is in fact murder. The poster was trying to exert Post hoc ergo propter hoc after establishing a diminishing returns on the terminology of “attempt”. I think that same algorithm is in play here.
The thing you have to remember is that there always exists a middle ground/neutral place for every situation, its just most of the time amoral, ineffective, or entirely irrelevant like the number Zero.
In conclusion let me put it in very simple Socratic terms even a 2 year old can understand:
“You want what you have right?” <-- see the concurrency there “want” and “have” happening at same time.
“So is it okay if I steal all of your stuff?” <-- obviously not lol
For more information on this phenomenon I suggest: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_relations_theory
There are of course many great INFP philosophers whom can iron out most the small details, I recommend one of those french guys whom know their social etiquette.